I completely understand the reasons why internet filters are in place in schools, I do. However, I feel as if our district blocks WAY too much. When things are blocked, it (our filter) gives a general reason. These reasons include but aren't limited to...
Violent
Pornography (Obviously 2 that need to stay blocked)
But then:
Discussion boards
Blog
Personal Pages
Technical or Business Forums
Many times when I try to research a tech question, the page that probably has the best answer is blocked. Reason: Technical Forum. Is this really to stop students from researching how to by-pass the filter/network in the first place?
Another example: The other week I went to find a site for Jackson Pollock's Birthday.
www.JacksonPollock.org was blocked. Reason: Personal Pages. Sure, we can jump through the hoops of getting something unblocked, but by the time that it is, the opportunity has past.
In an era of real-time learning, it seems we are cheating our students. For example, if researching World War II, a hate speech blog is stumbled upon, wouldn't that be a great learning opportunity to say: "Look, this is the internet, it’s not appropriate for school (or anywhere for that matter) but its life and as soon as you leave these walls, you might encounter it." Instead, because of that possibility, a blog featuring a primary source from the War (A CC prisoner, veteran, etc) falls under the same category and isn't accessible.
Where is the line drawn for your school? Has anyone found a successful compromise between all or nothing in the world of Internet filtering?