Change has a considerable psychological impact on the human mind. To the
fearful it is threatening because it means that things may get worse. To the hopeful it is encouraging because things may get better. To the confident it is inspiring because the challenge exists to make things better.
King Whitney Jr.
A few years ago, a big wig in my school district came up with an
interesting slogan. The slogan was “Special Education is a service, not a place.” What he was trying to emphasize was that the special education area in our district was something to be thought of a place where students and teachers can get help with specific needs, and not thought of as a place where you shuffle off kids that have difficulty in classes. A service, not a place.
That saying had left my mind until recently, when discussing the technology
standards that Texas requires kids to know. A teacher stated in a meeting that technology won’t be taught until it was tested on the state-mandated test. Hmm. Why isn’t it tested? Well, I thought about it, and then said back to her “We don’t test kids on how to use a pencil do we?” No, because the pencil is a tool. Like a book. We don’t test kids on how to USE a book. We might test them on what they learned from the book, but we don’t ask what the steps are to opening a book, turning the pages, or using the table of contents. We just assume a child has a certain level of understanding in the use of the tool; the book.
So it is with technology. The State of Texas does not test our students on
technology, because technology is a tool used to learn. They also do not test our students on how to open books, use a ball point pen, or how to use the library. Tools one and all, and none are tested.
No one asks whether or not pencils raise test scores. That is because
pencils are commonplace. They are ubiquitous. It is assumed that the pencil helps students improve test scores. Same with books. The book is just there. Students use the books. Students learn from the books.
Technology is not so common. We still lock up the laptops, we still pretty much
only allow the teacher to use the LCD projector, and sadly, we still limit kids to the technology lab when we want them to access information on the net. Education technology is still expensive, it is still not common everywhere, despite billions and billions of dollars spent getting it into every school and almost every class in the US. Technology is still a class and not yet a tool.
So how does one go about changing a mindset that many teachers and even
administrators may have about education technology? Like any tool, no one will use it unless a benefit is seen and experienced. Can this tool make life easier? Make boring less boring? Can this tool improve student learning, and probably the most common thought these days, will it increase test scores?
Yes to all of these things is the correct answer. Proving that to teachers
is another difficulty, because, unlike that damn pencil, technology isn’t everywhere and unlike the pencil, technology still intimidates. And kids that know more about technology than the teacher intimidates even more.
So the mind shift has to be made, somehow, that technology is a tool, not
a class, or a course, or a reward, or something to be avoided. One way is to get technology into the hands of all users, and make sure that they use it. That involves a money commitment not only to purchase, but to support, and train. Pencils don’t need much support other than a sharpener. The reason is already there, the law, in the form of the TEKS, is there, and in many cases the technology is there. We have to show the benefits, we have to prove that technology makes life easier, makes for smarter learners, and raises the darn test scores.
The trick is getting the teachers to make the kids drop the pencils and
pick up the keyboard, the remotes, the mice and the cameras.
You need to be a member of Classroom 2.0 to add comments!
Join Classroom 2.0