I know this can't be an original idea, but what if we actually worked with students as they designed curriculum for what they want to learn?
What would be the key processes to follow to ensure that students learned what is essential yet were able to engage in learning those things of interest to them?
For instance, if a student were to discover that he or she is interested in pursuing a career in software development, how could we satisfy the requirements of federal and state educational agencies for what students must know and be able to do (e.g., state standards, proficiency by 2013) while allowing the student to devote most of his or her time learning those things that will enable him or her to become a developer of software?
Is there a legitimate way to "beat the system" and still engage students in meaningful, purposeful learning?
You need to be a member of Classroom 2.0 to add comments!
Join Classroom 2.0